<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apertures and ISO Overview</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lydonphoto.com/wordpress/2007/apertures-and-iso-overview/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lydonphoto.com/wordpress/2007/apertures-and-iso-overview/</link>
	<description>Part technology, part photography... all geeky.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:14:43 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Photographing Sports at Night - The Tech + Photo Blog</title>
		<link>http://lydonphoto.com/wordpress/2007/apertures-and-iso-overview/comment-page-1/#comment-1562</link>
		<dc:creator>Photographing Sports at Night - The Tech + Photo Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 09:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lydonphoto.com/wordpress/?p=7#comment-1562</guid>
		<description>[...] High ISO - A fancy acronym for what is basically &#8220;sensitivity to light&#8221;, (read a primer on ISO here). A camera with the ability to shoot low-noise, high-ISO images helps a lot here. In some cases, you can make up for a slower lens with a super high-ISO, but you don&#8217;t want to rely on that because higher ISO can also mean a dirtier image. Do some test shots at ISO 1600, 3200, 6400, or whatever your highest settings are, and see which results are acceptable to you. For sports at night, you&#8217;ll usually want to peg that ISO as high as is reasonable. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] High ISO &#8211; A fancy acronym for what is basically &#8220;sensitivity to light&#8221;, (read a primer on ISO here). A camera with the ability to shoot low-noise, high-ISO images helps a lot here. In some cases, you can make up for a slower lens with a super high-ISO, but you don&#8217;t want to rely on that because higher ISO can also mean a dirtier image. Do some test shots at ISO 1600, 3200, 6400, or whatever your highest settings are, and see which results are acceptable to you. For sports at night, you&#8217;ll usually want to peg that ISO as high as is reasonable. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Focal Length and the Digital SLR - The Tech + Photo Blog</title>
		<link>http://lydonphoto.com/wordpress/2007/apertures-and-iso-overview/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Focal Length and the Digital SLR - The Tech + Photo Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 18:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lydonphoto.com/wordpress/?p=7#comment-28</guid>
		<description>[...] XHTML       &#8592; Lenses for The Digital World Apertures and ISO Overview &#8594; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] XHTML       &larr; Lenses for The Digital World Apertures and ISO Overview &rarr; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
