New technology is becoming more adept at solving other technology-related problems, but we should learn that it will never be able to solve all of our human-related problems. In fact, relying solely on technology, often makes things worse. A great example of technology gone completely berserk and useless is Ethanol fuel. So today, I’d take a quick look at this superhero fuel and the country that is backing it…
Yes, here comes team America trying to solve the “alternative fuel” puzzle by pushing corn-based ethanol as a cleaner burning, homegrown alternative. Ethanol is a natural food substance which provides a renewable energy source and helps decrease our dependency on foreign oil while stimulating domestic economic growth at the same time.
WHAT?
Well now, let not my opinionated banter sway you. Read up on some of the wondrous facts made available by our government on behalf of ethanol fuel. The following are the top 3 reasons why we should use corn-based ethanol to power our vehicles:[1]
Boosting Agriculture
Because it is made primarily from corn and other agricultural products, ethanol increases demand for these crops, increases the prices farmers receive for these crops, and brings economic development opportunity to the rural areas where the ethanol is made.
Let me give you another little tidbit of information here. American farmers already can’t produce enough corn to meet demand in the domestic market. Yes people, we use over half of our corn production to feed livestock and other forms of meat. Yes, it’s a completely inefficient use of energy in and of itself. That’s a whole different rant, and it’s a tangent I don’t want to go into here so keep reading…
Yup. American’s corn farmer’s can’t produce enough corn to feed the appetite of their fellow countrymen, countrywomen, and bovines yet we are burning it to make gas.I’ll give them one thing here. Ethanol does increase demand for corn, which in turn increases the price of corn. Nice. So I’m paying more for corn because you want to create some illusion that your mammoth V-8 SUV is environmentally friendly? OK, just a few little problems with that…
First, the inefficient distillation process used to create ethanol produces waste from what used to be a great deal of usable food and takes more energy to create than the energy it will provide to an ethanol-powered vehicle.[2]
Second, ethanol isn’t always cleaner burning than gasoline.[4]
Economic Stimulation
Ethanol production will generate an additional $19.6 million in household income annually.
Wonderful. Give America a minor shot of adrenaline right where it counts, in the thyroid. Or is it the buttox? At any rate, that doesn’t really matter. Really, do you know how irrelevant $19.6 million is to the American economy as a whole? Dwight Freeney, one of the top paid NFL players, was given a salary of over $30 million last year. Sure, he’s overpaid. But that’s not the point. The point is, a paltry 20 mil is nothing to a country whose national debt increases by 1.69 billion per day.[3]
Folks, let me also remind you that this is one of the purported TOP 3 REASONS why we should buy into ethanol.
Cleaner Air
Ethanol blends are likely to reduce carbon monoxide emissions in vehicles by between 10% - 30%, depending upon the combustion technology.
First, that HUGE percentage range given is really disconcerting on its own. Second, carbon monoxide emissions have already been reduced over 70% simply by creating improved engine and catalytic-based control technologies.[4] Many gas burning cars, such as the Hyundai Elantra and Volkswagon Jetta (PZEV versions) are certified as partial-zero-emissions vehicles. Gas can generally burn as clean as ethanol, so please remind me why we are wasting a potential food source if there are currently gas burning cars that are already cleaner than ethanol burning cars?[5]
Do I really need to close this out with some comment on how terrible of an idea Ethanol is? On how appalling it is that we are investing billions of dollars on a fuel that, even if every last kernel of domestic corn available was used, would put a roughly 10% dent in our gasoline needs?[7] There is no hope of replacing any remarkable portion of our energy needs with Ethanol.
Let’s start discussing other avenues. Perhaps ones filled with bicycles and pedestrians instead of cars powered by Orville Redenbacher.
-PL
Sources:
[1] According to the American Coalition for Ethanol - http://www.ethanol.org/index.php?id=34&parentid=8
[2]Roger Segelken, Cornell University - http://www.news.cornell.edu/Chronicle/01/8.23.01/Pimentel-ethanol.html
[3]According to the national debt clock - http://brillig.com/debt_clock/
[4] Statistic from Clean Car Campaign - http://www.cleancarcampaign.org/emissions.shtml
[5]CBC News - http://www.cbc.ca/canada/manitoba/story/2007/03/30/ethanol-emissions.html
[7]University of Minnesota - http://www1.umn.edu/umnnews/Feature_Stories/Ethanol_fuel_presents_a_cornundrum.html
Popularity: 50% [?]
8 responses so far ↓
1 Ben // Mar 11, 2008 at 9:08 am
Interesting thoughts, Pat. Ethanol is a fuel that I would want to get behind but, for some of the reasons you’ve brought up, can’t. It’s crazy that it takes more energy to produce than it saves in consumption. This is worse for the environment and more expensive for the consumer.
Note though that Brazil (and other South American countries) are way ahead of the US in pushing E85.
So what would a better fuel alternative be? Can hydrogen be cleanly produced and cheaply distributed enough to make it viable? Is biodiesel better? What solution would you favor most?
2 Patrick // Mar 11, 2008 at 10:46 am
Wow! It boggles my mind that Brazil and others pushing this even harder than we are. There are definitely some other biofuels that are at least more efficient in terms of energy made vs. energy spent. It’s likely that corn is popular just because it’s convenient.
We could all give up driving cars but in most situations, society demands it of us. We’d have to make a conscious decision all at once. Seems like far too much greed exists for that to work. Even when we see ourselves falling apart at the seams.
3 Ponti // Mar 11, 2008 at 11:27 am
Brazil is using sugar cane by-product (non-edible) to produce their ethanol though. And if my memory serves me correctly, sugar can produces much more ethanol than corn and grows all over Brazil. Plus, Brazil has a smaller population than the US so it might be a good option for them (maybe?) but I agree Patrick- really not a good idea for us. I’ve been hearing for a while about all the problems ethanol can create. I haven’t done a lot of research on hydrogen vehicles but maybe that’s the way to go?
Also, since I’m already on my soap box, people should also know that the Prius is a huge sham and causes more environmental damage than a HUMMER because a hummer is usually on the road for 3 times longer than the average pruis. Also, the nickel used in the prius battery is mined in Ontario, Canada and that site is now totally ravaged and poisoned for miles. Plus, the nickel is shipped from Canada, to Europe, then Japan and finally the US to make the battery so if you really want to be environmentally friendly, get a non-hybrid but gas-friendly car.
4 Patrick // Mar 11, 2008 at 11:41 am
I knew there were more reasons to hate the Prius other than the fact that my friend got hit by one in a crosswalk.
Thanks for getting on your soap box Ponti
5 Shazib // Mar 11, 2008 at 11:53 am
Hey Pat,
Great rant, I completely agree with the inefficiency of ethanol, and have for months. One thing I want to touch on is the last section on cleaner air. The point you made about CO emissions being reduced by 70% is something that people don’t realize, and a gentleman from Silicon Valley (Yay Home!) has written a book called Earth: The Sequel, which talks about the role capitalism plays in combating pollution. The gentleman’s name is Fred Krupp.
6 wei h. // Mar 11, 2008 at 12:01 pm
There is an interesting chapter in Michael Pollan’s book the Omnivore’s Dilemma about corn as a commodity. He outlines the history of changes in the farming of corn, as well as some very interesting facts about corn as cattle feed. Apparently about half of the corn grown in this country goes to feeding cattle and by feeding corn to ruminants is changing the pH of their stomachs and allowing things like e. Coli O157:H7 to live in their systems. Lots of interesting facts about corn commodity and how there’s too much of it but not enough…
7 Jason // Mar 11, 2008 at 5:48 pm
It’s all about Liquid Hydrogen! Haha.
8 Clifford // Jun 6, 2008 at 12:41 pm
I think the difference between Brazilian ethanol and US ethanol is that Brazil uses sugar instead corn…which is way more efficient. Plus Brazil has a bunch of fuel blends of gasoline and ethanol, and alcohol, and GASOHOL. Furthermore, Brazil makes so damn sugar that they use it as fuel for electricity. Brazil seems more organized and committed about using alternative fuel as energy. Seriously, 80 percent of automobiles in Brazil are flexfuel. We are low tech when it comes to efficiency. We just need to stop driving and ride bicycles like the Dutch. It would make all the difference.
Leave a Comment